>>> FROM FACEBOOK:
I have been thinking about why Ellen disappointed me so much hosting the Oscars the other night. I guess it must be because the Oscars have always celebrated Hoywood and excellence in the industry - or "The Dream Factory," as it was once called – and it's ability to transform the mundane into magic, thereby giving us hope and inspiration to keep going through a century of depressions, wars, plagues and transition. Whereas Ellen's mission was to bring each of our dream weavers "down a peg" and reassure the world that these fabulous monsters (as the French call their icons) were no more interesting, impressive or important than you or I are.
And isn't that the exact opposite of what the movies, at their best, do for us? And even if Hollywood is no longer always successful, isn't this the one night that we can hope that it is still possible, rather than celebrating the "dumbing down of America" and the average person's desperate need to believe that nobody "up there" is any better or more talented than all of us in front of our TV sets. Do we knock down our Olympic champions to prove that they are no better than us?
If Ellen is right and this is what people want, then what is there to dream of or to reach for? I think we go to the movies because we still desperately need and cling to the illusion that we are not alone and that there is something better, or at least more exciting, to aspire to for a few hours – which Ellen's style of hosting seemed determined to debunk with pizza and selfies.
Is this what we have come to as a population? Is Ellen just delivering what the average person wants? Or should the host be someone who "drives" the evening to help it rise above the common and into something magical – if just for one night? If not, it does not beckon well for all of us storytellers and filmmakers, I am afraid.
No comments:
Post a Comment